Delaktighet i forskningsprocessen
- PAR i en samtida kontext
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3384/SVT.2022.29.3-4.4672Nyckelord:
PAR, co-production, social work, applied research, robust knowledge, eldercareAbstract
Participation in the research process - PAR in a contemporary context.
Expectations and demands on coproduction in research have increased. Therefore, there is a need for knowledge on how these coproducing processes where researchers and practitioners work side by side during the research process can be carried out. In this article, methodological questions related to coproduction and collaboration between researchers and practitioners in the field of
social work are raised and discussed. The article draws on an on going research project where participatory action research (PAR) is the leading guideline. PAR in a contemporary context is understood as a democratization process, where values such as participation, mutual learning, empowerment, improvement and development of practice are given as much attention as the actual research findings. The research project discussed takes its starting point in Swedish eldercare, investigating situations of moral stress and moral agency. The project is carried out in close cooperation with three municipalities and institutions where future staff for eldercare are trained (social workers and auxiliary nurses). In the article the relations between researchers and practitioners are discussed. Strategies on how to establish cooperation applying a synergistic approach are highlighted. Furthermore, strategies for dissemination or research results are discussed. The article suggests PAR as a specific social work signature methodology, as PAR acknowledges the need for relational work as well as an action-oriented research agenda, well in line with the core values and understanding of social work as a professional practice and academic discipline. In the article, applying PAR in a contemporary context, is understood as a key component when striving for socially robust knowledge; that is, knowledge that is considered relevant and reliable in the eyes of all actors involved, in this case staff in municipal eldercare, as well as in academia.
Nedladdningar
Referenser
Abma, T., Groot, B. & Widdershoven, G. (2019). The ethics of public and service user involvement in health research: the need for participatory reflection on everyday ethical issues. The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), 23–25. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619869 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2019.1619869
Beresford, P. (2021). Participatory ideology: from exclusion to involvement. Policy Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447360490.001.0001
Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H., Elmersjö, M. & Kings, L. (2021). Aktionsforskning: socialt engagerad forskning i samhällsvetenskapen: möjligheter, utmaningar och variationer. I: H. Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, M. Elmersjö & L. Kings (red.), Aktionsforskning: möjligheter, utmaningar och variationer. Studentlitteratur.
Blair T, Minkler M. Participatory action research with older adults: Key principles in practice. The Gerontologist. 49(5):651-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnp049
Coghlan D, Holian R. (2007) Insider action research. The SAGE eencyclopedia of action research. SAGE publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750307072872
Elmersjö, M. & Bertilsdotter Rosqvist, H. (2022). The role of the researcher in participatory processes: a study of learning about place and place attachment in communities. Forskning og forandring, 5(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.23865/fof.v5.3283 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23865/fof.v5.3283
Forte (2021). https://forte.se/nyhet/kommande-utlysning-for-praktiknara-forskning-om-socialtjansten/.
Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogik för förtryckta. Gummesons.
Hetland, P., Kasperowski, D. & Nielsen, K. H. (2020). Denmark, Norway and Sweden: share, make useful and critically discuss: science communication. I: Communicating science: a global perspective. ANU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22459/CS.2020.11
Hollertz, K. (2010). Problemen förgår, lösningarna består: organisering av kommunala insatser för unga arbetslösa med försörjningsproblem. Lund dissertations in social work.
Hollertz, K., Wallinder, Y. & Jacobsson, K. (2021). Prefabricerade modulhus eller arkitektritade lösvirkeshus? Skilda handläggarideal inom Arbetsförmedlingen och Försäkringskassan. Arbetsmarknad & Arbetsliv, 27.
Hultqvist, S. (2021). The participatory turn in Swedish ageing research: productive interactions as learning and societal impact. Educational Gerontology, 47(11), 514–525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2021.2005509
Hultqvist, S. & Salonen, T. (2016). Brukardelaktighet i välfärdsstaten: retorik och praktik. I: V. Denvall, C. Heule, A. Kristiansson (red), Social mobilisering: en utmaning för socialt arbete. Gleerups Utbildning
Julkunen, I. & Koskinen, R. (2020). Beyond knowledge transfer in practice research in social work: I: The Routledge handbook of social work practice research. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199486-40
Jönson, H., Hultqvist, S., & Iwarsson, S. (2021). SAPO–en modell för samverkan mellan forskare och aktörer utanför akademin inom området äldre och åldrande. Äldre i Centrum Vetenskapligt supplement, 5-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52585/icvs.v1i1.2
Krogstrup, H. K. (2006). Evalueringsmodeller. Academica.
Larrison, T. & Korr, W. S. (2013). Does social work have a signature pedagogy? Journal of Social Work Education, 49(2), 194–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2013.768102
McLean, R. K. D., Graham, I. D., Tetroe, J. M. & Volmink, J. A. (2018). Translating research into action: an international study of the role of research funders. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16(1), 1–15. Crossref. PubMed. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0316-y
Mouffe, C. (1995). Post-Marxism: democracy and identity. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13(3), 259-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/d130259
Mouffe, C. (2000). Politics and passions. Ethical Perspectives, 7(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.7.2.503800
Nguyen, A. T., Burnside, S., Junge, K., Somerville, E. K., Keglovits, M. & Stark, S. L. (2020). Synergizing geriatric research and education in an allied health profession with an older adult community advisory board: development and process outcomes. Educational Gerontology, 46(8), 486–496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2020.1780369
Nowotny, H. (2003). Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge. Science and public policy, 30(3), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780461
Nowotny, H., Scott, P. B. & Gibbons, M. T. (2013). Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. John Wiley & Sons.
Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592711004877
Rydenfält, C., Holgersson, C., Östlund, B., Arvidsson, I., Johansson, G. & Persson, R. (2020). Picking low hanging fruit: a scoping review of work environment related interventions in the home care sector. Home Health Care Services Quarterly, 39(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621424.2020.1772936
Selener, D. (1997). Participatory action research and social change (2 uppl.). The Cornell Participatory Action Research Network, Cornell University.
SOU 2020:47. Hållbar socialtjänst: en ny socialtjänstlag. https://www.regeringen.se/4a4a67/contentassets/5809049f89744e2891cc2a93cfdb4840/sou-2020_47_del-1_till-webb.pdf.
SOU 2020/21:60. Forskning, frihet, framtid: kunskap och innovation fo?r Sverige.
Spaapen, J. & Van Drooge, L. J. R. (2011). Introducing ”productive interactions” in social impact assessment. Research Evaluation, 20(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/095820211X12941371876742
Szebehely, M. (2020). Internationella erfarenheter av covid-19 i äldreboenden. Underlagsrapport till SOU 2020:80, Äldreomsorgen under pandemin.
Timmermans, J., Blok, V., Braun, R., Wesselink, R. & Nielsen, R. Ø. (2020). Social labs as an inclusive methodology to implement and study social change: the case of responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7(3), 410–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1787751
Tops, D. & Sunesson, S. (2006). KUBAS: Erfarenheter från ett samarbetsprojekt mellan socialtjänsten i Helsingborg och Socialhögskolan i Lund. Meddelande från Socialhögskolan.
Wallengren Lynch, M., Bengtsson, A. R. & Hollertz, K. (2019). Applying a ”signature pedagogy” in the teaching of critical social work theory and practice. Social Work Education, 38(3), 289–301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2018.1498474
Warwick-Booth, L., Bagnall, A.-M. & Coan, S. (2021) Creating participatory research. Policy Press.
Weingart, P. (2008). Was ist Gesellschaftlich relevante Wissenschaft? I: A. Schavan (red.), Keine Wissenschaft für sich: Essays zur gesellschaftlichen Relevanz von Forschung (s. 15–24).
Unikt samarbete i forskningsprojekt om moralisk stress och aktörskap i svensk äldreomsorg, hämtad 20221107: //forskarskolanfys.se/2021/06/11/unikt-samarbete-i-forskningsprojekt-om-moralisk-stress-och-aktorskap-i-svensk-aldreomsorg/
Downloads
Publicerad
Referera så här
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Det här verket är licensierat under en Creative Commons Erkännande 4.0 Internationell-licens.
Allt material i Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift publiceras sedan 2022 (Vol 28 Nr 2) med omedelbar öppen tillgång (open access), under Creative Commons-licensen CC BY 4.0. Upphovsrätten till innehållet tillhör respektive författare.
Allt innehåll i tidskriften är fritt tillgängligt utan kostnad och får fritt läsas, laddas ned, kopieras, delas, skrivas ut och länkas. När innehållet används måste författare, källa och licens anges. Författaren kan fritt göra sin publicerade text tillgänglig på institutionella och internetbaserade arkiv, exempelvis sitt lärosätes digitala arkiv eller andra tjänster för detta.
Inga publiceringsavgifter tas ut vid publicering i Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift.
